• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Look first at relevant experience, not the number of logos on the website. Ask to see two or three engagements that resemble your domain and your stack, and then ask specifically who actually wrote that code. A solid partner will introduce you to the tech lead. Answers that name nobody at this stage generally mean the delivery team is not the team you were shown.

The agreement needs more attention than the sales deck. A few clauses carry most of the weight: ownership of the code, confidentiality, and notice periods and php development services handover. Everything produced should transfer to you once invoices are settled, including documentation, pipelines and deployment scripts. Watch for any clause that leaves framework code outside the transfer, because this is frequently the dependency that makes switching painful.

Ask where their numbers come from. An honest estimate arrives with the assumptions behind it, a task-level breakdown and a range rather than a single number. A fixed-bid deal only makes sense when the scope is genuinely frozen; in any other case the provider adds a risk premium and you pay for uncertainty either way. Hourly billing moves the risk back to the client, so it needs visible weekly reporting and a spending cap.

Process matters more than team size. Find out what happens when the scope changes, who signs off on a feature and business automation software development what the QA setup looks like. A mature team can show you running software rather than status reports. Written acceptance criteria stay the only reliable protection against endless rounds of rework.

Before signing, think about the day you no longer need this vendor before it outsourcing dubai becomes urgent. Require that the source repository stays under your account from the beginning, and that documentation is updated as part of the work. A partner who is comfortable with this accepts it without argument; hesitation here reveals quite a lot.